Commenting on An Idealist Understanding of Consciousness

Andre Gaudreault (Gaudwin)
3 min readJun 16, 2022


Graham Pemberton, the author, responding to my comment that everything that existed at the beginning was “strings of Information.” :

Maybe it works the other way round. But is there any good reason to think so? How would we explain the origin of the universe etc?The position that I've outlined is that of the majority of spiritual systems.

How would I explain the origin of the universe etc.?

Here’s how:

Instead of saying like Nikolas Tesla who said that: “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration,” I say: “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of [information], frequency and vibration.”

And I interpret John 1:1 “At the beginning was the Word…” as such: “At the beginning was the String, and the String was with the Singularity, and the String was the Singularity.” John 1:1 Quantum Mechanics Version

There you have it, the beginning explained in quantum terms and giving us the reason why we are not living anymore in the Garden of Eden: We “objectified” ourselves by eating “the fruit of good an evil.”

You will tell me, “but how such “bits of information” become things as concrete as electrons and protons composing mater and ourselves?”

I will tell you that electrons and protons, when not observed, are also “waves of information,” having no other reality than complex bits of information only “objectified” when observed or entering in contact with other bits of information.

This objectification process can be expressed in classical terms using the concept of “species.” Indeed, species are themselves not observable “objects” but concepts (information), which, when entering in relation with other waves of information (with other species’s niches), create the biosphere, which, again, only exists for us because we induce it while “objectifying” its “wavicle” components, cats dogs, humans, grass, etc., which also are waveicle composites interacting with other such composites when not observed.

And if we extend this analogy to ourselves and to the moon, we will realize that we see ourselves as objects because we are self-conscious, and the moon is there because we observe it as self-conscious individuals. When not observe it is composed of types of “waves” in dynamics equilibrium (gravitation) with the Earth and the rest of the universe.

And since no other entities are self-conscious, they all exist as waves of information always in accord with the Laws:

Indeed, I reiterate that “If you want to find the secrets of the [biosphere], think in terms of [information], frequency and vibration.” Nikola Tesla, My Interpretation.

Species are indeed homeostatic entities regulated by negative feedback:

Joel de Rosnay’s The Macroscope

Or express in homeostatic terms, in terms waves of information:


There you have it the wave-particles dichotomy at the classical level.

Buddha would have been in accord with me because this is what he was, a wave of information; and what we are when we enter in deep meditation.

PS I will explain in my PhD dissertation, KNOW THYSELF IN QUANTUM TERMS understandable by nine-years-old, why we are genuine waves of information.
I’m not yet an Einstein, who could allegedly do it for six-year-olds, but I did well I believe for nine-year-olds, the ones for whom it is crucial to understand what “objectification” did to their environment.



Andre Gaudreault (Gaudwin)

70+generalist, two general BA & one unspecialized MA in ZooAnthropoSociology acquired to find out why specialists cannot solve the problems created by progress.